In an astonishing turn of events, a member of the EU Parliament from the Netherlands, Dutch PM Rob Roos, questioned the leading representative from Pfizer during an EU hearing.
Roos asked Janine Small, president of international developed markets at Pfizer if the mRNA vaccine was ever tested to see if it blocked transmission of the virus.
Pfizer executive admits that their COVID vaccine was never tested to see if it would stop transmission. pic.twitter.com/Q80ok2HVva
— Eric Matheny 🎙 (@EricMMatheny) October 12, 2022
The highlights of the exchange [Emphasis mine].
Roos: A Question for you, Ms. Small. And I would like a clear answer please, so there are no misunderstandings. Was the Pfizer covid vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the marketplace.
If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want a straight answer: Yes or no. And I’m looking forward to it…
Small:In regards to your question about stopping immunization before it entered the market..No. We had to really move at the speed of science….to really understand what is taking place in the market.
And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. I think Dr. Boulra [Pfizer CEO]..would turn around and say to you himself, “If not us, then who?”
Dr. Boulra actually felt the importance of what was going on in the world and, therefore, as a result of that we actually spent 2 billion dollars of self-funded money at risk to research, develop, and manufacture to make sure we were in a position to help with the pandemic.
As a reminder, Bourla tested positive twice within two months for covid, despite receiving the complete vaccine series and the booster.
Fox News medical contributor Dr. Marc Siegel recently expanded upon the true nature of the Pfizer vaccine.
Siegel said the main problem is that only a small group of individuals were studied before the vaccine’s rollout.
“The vaccine itself was designed not to prevent transmission. It is not called a barrier vaccine. It doesn’t work here in the nostrils. It works inside the lungs, and it decreases severity,” Siegel explained.
Roos was disturbed by the answer, as were many others. As he noted in his follow-up video, preventing transmission was clearly a lie.
“This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth ‘you do it for others’.
“Now, it has turned out to be a cheap lie. This should be exposed.”
A good example of one of the “fact-checks” to dismiss concerns about the failure of the covid vaccines to prevent transmission comes from USA Today, almost exactly a year ago:
Fact check:COVID-19 vaccine protects both the person vaccinated and those around them.
“This is false information,” Akiko Iwasaki, a professor of immunobiology and molecular, cellular and developmental biology at Yale University, said in an email. “Vaccines provide significant protection from ‘getting it’ – infection – and ‘spreading it’ – transmission – even against the delta variant.”
This is a valuable lesson about the dangers of the triumvirate of Big Tech-Big Pharma-Big Government suppressing reasonable debate and rational concerns.
Yet, California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed a bill that will discipline doctors who give what the government views as “misinformation“.
…[C]ritics of the law, including many mainstream doctors who have advocated passionately for masks and vaccines, say it could end up curbing well-intentioned conversations between patients and physicians about a disease that’s still changing from one month to the next.
“There’s clear misinformation that’s happening that’s as black and white as you can get. But there’s a lot of gray out there too,” said Dr. Eric Widera, a professor of medicine at UC San Francisco who specializes in geriatrics.
With COVID-19, he said, “the standard of care has changed a lot in 2½ years.” Earlier in the pandemic, he recorded instructional videos for his children’s school on how to properly wear cloth face masks. Today such masks are largely dismissed as ineffective.
That’s a nonclinical example of a truth about the evolution of medical research, Widera said: “What was misinformation one day is the current scientific thinking another day.”
Will Newsom now punish doctors who asserted these vaccines did prevent transmission…which now must be classified as “misinformation”?
This content was originally published here.
